One platform vs. a patchwork of tools.
Teams stitch together a tool per channel, then pay per seat for each. Here's how SpeedIQ stacks up against the usual alternatives.
- One workspace
- No per-seat fees
- Single bill
What you get, side by side.
The case for consolidating.
One workspace, not five
Stop paying for and switching between a separate tool per channel. SpeedIQ collapses WhatsApp, Email, and SMS into a single shared inbox.
Pay for messages, not seats
Competitors charge per agent and per channel. We charge credits for the messages you actually send, invite the whole team for free.
Automations without engineering
Build branching, trigger-based flows yourself. No connecting three tools with brittle integrations, no waiting on a sprint.
Analytics that already line up
Because every channel lives in one platform, delivery, opens, and replies are comparable out of the box, no manual stitching in a spreadsheet.
Switching questions, answered.
What teams usually ask when moving off a patchwork of tools.
How is SpeedIQ cheaper than separate tools?
You stop paying per seat and per channel. SpeedIQ charges credits for the messages you actually send, and the whole team is included free.
Is migrating off my current tools painful?
No. Import contacts, connect your channels, and you're live in an afternoon, no brittle integrations to maintain between separate tools.
What do I lose by consolidating?
Not the features that matter, campaigns, automations, templates, and analytics all come built in, and they finally share one contact history.
Do the analytics really line up across channels?
Yes. Because every channel lives in one platform, delivery, opens, and replies are comparable out of the box, no spreadsheet stitching.